WebMar 11, 2024 · Sigma’s are also very well built overall, though the 24-70mm f2.8 is the better-protected lens offering. 24-70mm F2.8 Lenses Reviews to Look At. Canon RF 24-70mm f2.8 L IS USM; Nikon 24-70mm f2 ... WebJan 3, 2010 · Pete 21 18.8k 97. 29 Dec 2009 7:28PM. Like 0. f/1.8 gives shallower depth of field which some people prefer but this is less obvious on such wide lenses, so what you …
Sony FE 50mm F2.5 G Lens Review - The-Digital-Picture.com
Web2 days ago · 1. Basil Fawlty wrote: I currently have an EF 135 f/2 that I use with an adapter on my R5. I am just wondering if anyone here has experience with the EF 135 vs the RF 135 f/1.8? My EF version is quite nice but wondering if the f1.8 would be worth the upgrade (I don't care about the control ring functionality). WebCompare Canon RF 24-50mm f 4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Canon RF vs Canon RF 24mm f 1.8 Macro IS STM Lens vs Canon RF 16mm f 2.8 STM Lens Press ? ? Enter ? for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers chipper jones game of thrones shirt
RF 70-200/4.0 vs 2.8 - Digital Photography Review
WebNov 27, 2011 · The biggest difference that pops out is the f/2.8 lenses do have that extra stop of light but the f/4 lenses both have image stabilization (or vibration reduction). WebCanon 5D mark II, EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM @ 138mm, ISO 50, 8 sec., f/32 Choosing f/2.8 vs f/4 The first pro grade f/4 zoom that I used was the original Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM. I was heading out on a multi-day hike and weight was critical. With the options at the time, the f/4 version was about half the weight of the f/2.8 model. WebNov 1, 2024 · Thanks for sharing your Astro experience with the RF 16mm F2.8, I am an astro ( milky way ) shooter but currently not using my Canon system for this application simply because I don't have a great Astro lens on my Canon system, your sample image looks very decent for a $300 lens. most of the Canon fast prime I had before had much … granville taylor norristown died 1942